RICERCA ITALIANA     

Programmi di ricerca simili:

• 1 - La tutela multilivello dei diritti sociali
• 2 - Dinamiche evolutive e le determinanti della performance nei cluster di imprese.
• 3 - La riforma della legge fallimentare: bilanci e prospettive alla luce delle esperienze maturate in Europa e negli U.S.A.
• 4 - PROGRESSO TECNOLOGICO E MUTAMENTI NORMATIVI: L'ADEGUAMENTO DELLE TECNICHE E DEI MODELLI DI TUTELA GIURIDICA DEI DIRITTI FONDAMENTALI NEI PRINCIPALI SISTEMI GIURIDICI CONTEMPORANEI
• 5 - Livelli di governo e integrazione multiculturale nell’esperienza europea: dalle istituzioni ai diritti
• 6 - Lavoro, trans-nazionalizzazione della attività di impresa e tecniche giuridiche di riequilibrio negoziale
• 7 - Imprese multinazionali e diritto internazionale: obblighi e forme di responsabilità
• 8 - L'Action Plan UE sulla corporate governance: un'analisi giuridico-economica delle principali problematiche
• 9 - Riparto di funzioni e responsabilità datoriali e garanzia dei diritti del lavoratore nei fenomeni di frammentazione, trasformazione e successione dell'impresa
• 10 - Modelli di impresa nel capitalismo industriale italiano del Novecento

Classificazione scientifico-disciplinare

• Area scientifico disciplinare: Scienze giuridiche
  • DIRITTO PRIVATO COMPARATO

Classificazione geografica

• Regione: Lazio

Bibliografia

AA.VV., Fundaçoes, Origem e Evoluçao historica,Brasilia,PJFE,Ministerio do Districto Federal e dos Territorios, 2003; AA.VV.,Gli enti “non profit”.Nuove figure e nuove problematiche,Milano,1993; AA.VV.,Le Fondazioni bancarie italiane verso l’attività grant making. Le Fondazioni grant making in Germania e negli Stati Uniti, (a cura di RANCI-BARBETTA),Torino,1996; ALFRED-CHANDLER,Strategia e struttura:storia della grande impresa americana Milano,1980;ALVORD-BROWN-LETTS, Social Enterpreneurship an Social Transformation:an Explanatory Study,The Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Harvard University,2002,Working paper 15,p.15;ANHEIER,Foundations in Europe:A comparative Perspective, Working paper n.18, London, London School of Economics,2001;ANHEIER-SEIBEL, The Third Sector:comparative studies of non profit organizations,New York,1990;AREL,Le Fondazioni bancarie: stato di attuazione della Riforma e prospettive,Convegno 24 ottobre 2001,in Il Risparmio,2002;AUSTIN,The Collaboration Challenge. How nonprofits and Business Succeed Through Strategic Alliance,San francisco,2000;BEN-NER,Non-Profit Organizations:Why do they exist in Market Economics, in ROSE ACKERMAN,The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions,New York,Oxford,1986;BEN-NER,The Nonprofit Sector in the Mixed Economy, University of Michigan Press,1993;BEN-NER,VAN HOOMISSEN, Nonprofit Organizations in the Mixed Economy: A Demand and Supply Analysis,in Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,62,4,p.695; COEHLO, Da Natureza Juridica das Fundaçoes istituidas pelo Poder Publico, vol.33,n.139,pp.107-122, Brasilia,Ministerio da Justiça,1976;COEHLO,Fundaçoes Publicas, Rio do Janeiro,Ed.Forense,1978; COING,Die Treuhand kraft privaten Rechtsgeschäft,München,1973;DEL CAMPO ARBULO,Historia das Fundaçoes,Sao Paulo,1988; EMERSON,Philantropic Foundations,New York,Russell Sage Foundation,1974;EMERSON,The US Non Profit Capital Market:An introductory Overview of Developmental Stages,Ivestors and Funding Instruments Robets Enterprise Development Fund Foundation; HAMMACK,Community Foundations:The delicate Question of Purpose in MAGAT,An agile Servant, New York, The Council of Foundations,1989; HANSMANN,A Reform Agenda for the Law of Nonprofit Organizations,American Law Institute,2000; HANSMANN,Economic Theories of Nonprofit organizations in POWELL, The Non Profit Sector: A research Handbook,Yale,1986,120; HANSMANN,The Role of the Nonprofit Enterprise, in ROSE-ACKERMAN,The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions, New York, Oxford University Press,1986;HARTLEY,The foundations of European Community law,Oxford,1994;HASLINGER R.,Stiftungen in Oesterreich. Wien, Die Welt von NGOs, 2003;KARL-KATZ,Foundations and the Ruling Class,in Daedalus,116 (1),1987,pp 1-40;KIGER,Foundations in World Book Encyclopedia,Chicago,1974;KRAFFT,Les fonds de prévoyance et la théorie générale des fondations,Lausanne,1956;PORTER-KRAMERR,The CompetitiveAdvantage of Corporate Philanthropy,in “Harvard Business Review”,December 2002,pp. 67-68;POWELL,The Non-profit Sector:A research Handbook,Yale,1986;RAMSES OWENS,Panamian asset protection trusts and foundations,in Trusts,2000,370;ROSE-ACKERMAN,The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions,New York,1986;SAENZ DE MIERA, Las bases legales de las Fundaciones, Barcelona,2000; SALAMON-ANHEIER,In search of the non-profit sector:the question of definition, in The John Hopkins Comparative Non Profit sector project,Baltimore,1992; SALAMON,Partners in Public Service:Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State,Baltimore,1995; SANTINI, Le community foundations americane: sviluppo e potenzialità,in Non profit, 2003,pp. 45-68;SHANNON,Corporate Contributions Handbook,San Francisco,1991,p.47; THOMSEN,Foundation Ownership and Economic Performance,Corporate governance,1996;VAN DER PLOEGH, A comparative Legal Analysis of Foundations: Aspects of Supervision and Transparency,in ANHEIER-TOEPLER,Private Funds, Public Purpose,New York,1999; CAMPENAUSEN-KRONKE-WERNER,Stiftungen in Deutschland und Europa,Düsseldorf,1998; WEISBROD,The Nonprofit Economy, Cambridge, Massachussets,, Harvard University Press, 1988;WEISBROD,Toward a Theory of the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector in a Three-Sector Economy, in Rose-Ackerman S.(edited by),The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions, New York, Oxford University Press,1986;WHITAKER, The Foundations: An Anatomy of Philantropic Societies,New York,Penguin,1979;AA.VV. Insolvency & Restructuring in 31 jurisdictions worldwide - 2000, Law Business Research, London 1999;ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, Bankruptcy Basics, II ed. April 2004;ALTMAN, Corporate Financial Distress, a complete guide to predicting, avoiding and dealing with bankruptcy, J. Wiley, New York, 1993;AYER–BERNSTEIN, Bankruptcy in practice, American Bankruptcy Institute, 2002;AYER, Goodbye to Chapter 11: The End of Business Bankruptcy As We Know It, Amicus Curiae, Issue 34, March/April 2001;CANDELARIO MACÍAS, Il diritto concorsuale in Europa, Padova 2001;CHAPUT, Droit du redressement et de la liquidation judiciaires des entreprises, III éd., PUF 1996;CHARVERIAT–Martin, Défaillances d'entreprises, éd. Francis Lefebvre 1997;COQUELET, Entreprises en difficulté, instruments de paiement et de crédit, Dalloz 2003;CORAPI–PIERFELICI, Procedure concorsuali. II. Diritto comparato e straniero, in Enc. giur. Treccani, vol. XXIV, Roma 1991;COURET–MORVILLIERS–DE SAINTENAC, Le traitement amiable des difficultés des entreprises, Economica 1995;DERRIDA–GODE–SORTAIS, Redressement et liquidation judiciaires des entreprises, IV éd. Dalloz 1999;DIDIER, Droit commercial, t. V, L'entreprise en difficulté, PUF 1995;DUFRESNE’, Le droit de la nouvelle faillite, les récentes modifications à la L.f.i., in Journal du barreau, 1998, 30, 16;ESPLUGUES, The Uncitral model law of 1997 on cross border insolvency: an approach, in Dir. comm., internaz.,1998,657;FINCH,Re-Invigorating Corporate Rescue, in The Journal of Business Law, 2003, 527;FINCH, The measures of Insolvency Law, in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1997, 227;FLETCHER, The Law of Insolvency, London 1996;GOODE, Principles of Corporate Insolvency Law, Sweet and Maxwell, London 1997;GOTTWALD, Das neue Insolvenzrecht,Berlin 1994;GRIER–FLOYD,Personal Insolvency: a Practical Guide, London 1998;GRUNSKY, La procedura di insolvenza nell’esperienza tedesca alla luce del regolamento comunitario, in Annuario di dir. tedesco, a cura di S. PATTI,Milano 2003,p.479 ss.;GUYON, Droit des affaires. Tome 2. Entreprises en difficultés. Redressement judiciaire - Faillite, IX éd.,Economica 2003;HABSCHEID, Verso un diritto fallimentare europeo, in Riv. trim. dir e proc. civ., 1993, 1105;HANSEN, Never Höchststand der Insolvenzen, AG, 1997, 328;HUNTER, The Nature and Functions of a Rescue Culture, in Journ. Bus. Law, 1999, 491;IDOT, La "faillite" dans la Communauté: enfin une convention internationale?, in Dr. prat. comm.internat., 1995, 34;JACQUEMONT, Droit des entreprises en difficulté,III èd., Litec 2003;JEANTIN–LE CANNU, Droit commercial. Instruments de paiement et de crédit., entreprises en difficulté, VI éd. Précis Dalloz 2003;KERCKHOVE, Procédures collectives de paiement, Montchrestien 1998;SAINT-ALARY-HOUIN, Droit des entreprises en difficulté,IV éd. Montchrestien 2001;SCHMIDT–RÄNTSCH, Insolvenzordnung mit Einführungsgesetz, Bundesanzeiger Köln, 1995;SGARD,L'Etat et la "sanction du marché": l'expérience de la faillite, Esprit, Déc.2004;VALLANSAN, Redressement et liquidations judiciaires,Litec 1996;G.Ferri, Impresa coniugale e impresa familiare, in Riv.dir.comm.,1976, I,p.1 ss.; PANNUCCIO, L'impresa familiare,Milano,1976;AMES,The Origin of Uses and Trusts,in Select Essay in Anglo-American Legal History,II, 1908; HOPT MENJUCQ/WYMEERSCH,La société européenne;2003; TEICHMANN,Gestaltungsfreiheit im monistischen Leitungssystem der Europäischen Aktiengesellschaft,BB,2004,54; MELIS,Corporate governance un'analisi empirica della realta italiana in un'ottica europea,Torino,1999.

Parole Chiave

DIRITTO COMPARATO, DIRITTO COMUNITARIO, SOCIETA', MODELLI DI ORGANIZZAZIONE DELL'IMPRESA, FONDAZIONI D'IMPRESA, IMPRESA, PROCEDURA CONCORSUALE, SISTEMI GIURIDICI CONTEMPORANEI, ARMONIZZAZIONE