Contenuto
Ti trovi in: HOME »Programmi, progetti e risultati »I progetti »PRIN - Programmi di ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale»Programma di ricercaINIZIO_TESTO_DA_INDICIZZARE
RESEARCH PROGRAM
italiano - inglese
Research Units
Similar research programs:
- 1 - The principles of the environmental administrative law
- 2 - Individual guarantees and judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the European Union
- 3 - The protection of fundamental rights in the national and supranational legal systems, in the perspective of a "European" Constitution
- 4 - EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW BETWEEN INTERNAL MARKET AND EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
- 5 - The Individual Right of Access to Justice in International Law
- 6 - Illegal Immigration between Instruments of Contrast and Safeguard of Fundamental Rights
- 7 - Multi-level Governance and multicultural Integration in the european Experience: Institutions and Rights
- 8 - European private international law in transition: from the 1980 Rome convention on the law applicable to contracts to the recent proposal of a European Comunity regulation
- 9 - Development of criminal law in the aereas of European interest in the perspective of the new reform proposals of the Treaties
- 10 - Criminal Law and Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
Scientific and education field classification
Geographical classification
- Region: Lombardia
Bibliografia
Sulle competenze comunitarie in materia di diritto internazionale privato: Kohler, Interrogation sur les sources du droit international privé européen après le Traité d’Amsterdam, RCDIP, 1999, p. 3 ss; Basedow, The Communitaristion of the Conflicts of Laws under the Treaty of Amsterdam, CMLRev., 2000, p. 687 ss; Jessurun d’Oliveira, The EU and a Metamorphosis of Private International Law, in Essays North, 2002, p. 132 ss.; Mansel, Zum Systemwechsel im europäischen Kollisionsrecht nach Amsterdam und Nizza, in Systemwechsel im europäischen Kollisionsrecht, 2002, p. 14 ss.; Bariatti, Le competenze comunitarie in materia di diritto internazionale privato e processuale, in Casi e materiali di diritto internazionale privato comunitario, 2003, p. 3 ss.; Fuchs, Muir Watt, Pataut (dir.), Les conflits de lois et le système juridique communautaire, 2004; Lagarde, Développements futurs du droit international privé dans une Europe en voie d’unification: quelques conjectures, RabelsZ, 2004, p. 231 ss.; Carbone, Fumagalli, Frigo, Diritto processuale civile e commerciale comunitario, 2004; Picone, Diritto internazionale privato e diritto comunitario, 2004; De Cesari, Diritto internazionale privato e processuale comunitario, 2a ed., 2005; Kreuzer, Zu Stand und Perspektiven des Europäischen Internationalen Privatrechts, RabelsZ, 2006, p. 80 ss.Sui rapporti tra diritto internazionale privato comunitario e libertà fondamentali: Fallon, Meeusen, Private international law in the European Union and the exception of mutual recognition, Yearbook PIL, 2002, p. 37 ss.; Wilderspin, Lewis, Les relations entre le droit communautaire et les règles de conflits de lois des Etats membres, RCDIP, 2002, pp. 1 ss., 289 ss.; Bariatti, Prime considerazioni sugli effetti dei principi generali e delle norme materiali del trattato CE sul diritto internazionale privato comunitario, RDIPP, 2003, pp. 671-706; Heuzé, De la compétence de la loi du pays d'origine en matière contractuelle ou l'anti-droit européen, Mélanges Lagarde, 2005, p. 393 ss.; Fallon, Libertés communautaires et règles de conflit de lois, in Les conflits de lois et le système juridique communautaire, 2004, p. 31 ss.
Sulla libera circolazione delle società alla luce delle recenti pronunce della Corte di giustizia: Benedettelli, Libertà comunitarie di circolazione e diritto internazionale privato delle società, RDIPP, 2001, p. 569 ss.; Lombardo, Regulatory Competition in Company Law in the European Community, 2002; Ballarino, Sulla mobilità delle società nella Comunità europea, Riv.soc., 2003, p. 669 ss.; Contaldi, Il diritto comunitario delle società tra evoluzioni giurisprudenziali e legge di riforma della materia, DUE, 2003, p. 711 ss.; Roth, From Centros to Uberseering: Free Movement of Companies, Private International Law and Community Law, ICLQ, 2003, p. 181 ss.; Pataut, Liberté d’établissement et droit international privé des sociétés: un pas de plus, Dalloz, 2004, p. 494 ss.; Kraakman, Davies, The Anatomy of Corporate Law, 2004; Ebke, The European Conflict-of-Corporate-laws Revolution: Uberseering, Inspire Art and Beyond, EBOLR, 2005, p.9 ss.; Troeger, Choice of Jurisdiction in European Corporate Law, EBOLR, 2005, p. 159 ss.
In generale sulle competenze comunitarie in materia di famiglia: Baratta, Il regolamento comunitario sul diritto internazionale privato della famiglia, in Picone, Diritto internazionale privato e diritto comunitario, 2004 p. 163 ss.; De Groot, Towards European Conflict Rules in Matters of Personal Status, MJ, 2004, p. 115 ss.; Mengozzi, I problemi giuridici della famiglia a fronte del processo di integrazione europea, Fam.dir., 2004, p. 643 ss.; Caracciolo di Torella, Masselot, Under Construction: EU family law, ELR, 2004 p. 36 ss.; Brunetta d’Usseaux(ed.), Il diritto di famiglia nell’Unione europea, 2005; Davì, Il diritto internazionale privato italiano della famiglia e le fonti di origine internazionale o comunitaria, RDI, 2002, p. 1 ss.; Hausmann, Il nuovo diritto internazionale processuale in materia matrimoniale nell’Unione europea, EuLF, 2000/01, pp. 271 ss., 345 ss.
Sulla circolazione degli status familiari: Fallon, Libertés communautaires et règles de conflits de lois, in Les conflits des lois et le système juridique communautaire, 2004, p. 31-81; Toner, Partnership Rights, Free Movement and EU Law, 2004, p. 53 ss.; Boele-Woelki, Fuchs(ed.), Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples in Europe, 2003, p. 178 ss.; Tomasi, Status familiari e libera circolazione dei cittadini dell’Unione, in Baruffi (ed.), Il futuro dell’Unione europea. Sviluppi nelle sue politiche, 2004, p. 191 ss.; Reich, Harbacevica, Citizenship and family on trial: a fairly optimistic overview of recent Court practice with regard to free movement of persons, CMLRev., 2003, p. 615 ss.
In materia di obblighi alimentari: Baruffi, Art. 45, NLCC, 1996, p. 1273 ss.;Biscaretti di Ruffia, Le obbligazioni alimentari nel diritto internazionale privato convenzionale, 1989; De Cesari, Le nuove convenzioni dell’Aja in materia di obbligazioni alimentari, RDIPP, 1983, p. 42 ss.; Lagarde, Observations sur l'articulation des questions de statut personnel et des questions alimentaires dans l'application des conventions de droit international privé, in Mélanges von Overbeck, 1990, p. 511 ss.; Verwilghen, Les obligations alimentaires en droit conventionnel. L'obligation alimentaire en droit international privé, 1987.
Sulla circolazione degli atti pubblici e dei testamenti: Les successions internationales dans l’UE – Perspective pour une Harmonisation, 2004; Biscaretti di Ruffia, Considerazioni sulla nuova legge in materia di pubblicità di atti formati all’estero, RDIPP, 1980, p. 554 ss.; Biscottini, Diritto amministrativo internazionale, I, 1964; Cafari Panico, L’efficacia esecutiva degli atti pubblici nel Reg. c.d. “Bruxelles I”, Int’l Lis, Inv.2003/2004, p. 43 ss.; Callé, L’acte public en droit international privé, 2004; Campeis, De Pauli, La disciplina europea del processo civile italiano, 2005; Consiglio Nazionale del Notariato, Réponses au questionnaire en matière de successions et testaments. Livre vert de la Commission européenne, 2005 ; Masson, la libera circolazione dell’informazione e degli atti, Riv.not., 1990, p. 33 ss.; Mengozzi, Il notaio e la nuova concezione dell’ordinamento dello Stato che ispira la l. 31 marzo 1995 n. 218 di riforma del sistema italiano di diritto internazionale privato, Riv.not., 1996, I, p. 103 ss.; Pamboukis, L'acte public etranger en droit international privé, 1993; Pasqualis, Il problema della circolazione in Italia degli atti notarili provenienti dall’estero, in Consiglio Nazionale del Notariato. Relazioni al XXIII Congresso Internazionale del Notariato Latino, Atene, 2001, p. 465 ss.; Piccoli, Ruotolo, Velletti, La circolazione degli atti notarili nello spazio giuridico europeo e la riforma del diritto internazionale privato, Riv.not., 1996, p. 1377 ss.; Starace, Intorno alla dichiarazione di efficacia esecutiva degli atti pubblici stranieri, RDI, 1963, p. 674 ss.;
Sull’abuso di driitto nel sistema comunitario: Fallon, La délocalisation comme instrument de fraude lié à la circulation des biens et des personnes, in Mélanges Cerexhe, 1997, p. 166 ss.; Kjellgren, On the Border of Abuse: the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice on Circumvention, Fraud and Abuses of Community Law, in Services and Free Movement in EU Law, 2002, p. 245 ss.; Triantafyllou, L’interdiction des abus de droit en tant que principe général du droit communautaire, Cahiers dr.eur., 2002, p. 618 ss.; Waelbroeck, La notion d’abus de droit dans l’ordre juridique communautaire, in Mélanges Louis, I, 2003, p. 607 ss.; Martiny, Die Zukunft des europäischen ordre public im Internationalen Privat- und Zivilverfahrensrecht, in Festschrift Sonnenberger, 2004, p. 541 ss.
Keywords
EC PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, EC LAW, FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS, FREE MOVEMENT OF COMPANIES, LAW APPLICABLE TO SUCCESSIONS, LAW APPLICABLE TO MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONSEC Private International Law and free movement provisions in matters concerning personal status and successions
Università degli Studi di MilanoAbstract
The enlargement of the EC competence in the field of private international law has been the object of many and thorough studies both in Italy and abroad. Several scholars analysed the acts adopted or to be adopted by EC institutions, the relationship between EC choice-of-laws rules and national conflict and substantive provisions, of the respective external competence of the EC and member States, and on the relationship of EC conflict of law rules with Ec principles and rules on free movement.Within this general framework, this research group aims at analysing the interaction between private international law and EC free movement provisions in matters of personal status (for both legal and natural persons) and successions.
Actually, in recent years some decisions of the EC Court of justice on free movement have shown that the relationhip between such rules and principles are developing and that the final solutions to be adopted are not clear yet. Apparently, the EC and its Member States seem to grant different values and to defend different principles: on the one hand, the realisation of a common and integrated area of freedom and justice, where natural and legal persons may circulate without any legal restriction or obstacle and realize their expectations; on the other hand, States aim at exercising their legislative competence in order to reach a number of goals that may limit individual rights. While in some recent but still rare cases the EC legislature >>>
Principal Investigator
Stefania Bariatti Università degli Studi di MILANOResearch Objectives
The enlargement of the EC competence in the field of private international law has been the object of many and thorough studies both in Italy and abroad. Several scholars analysed the acts adopted or to be adopted by EC institutions, the relationship between EC choice-of-laws rules and national conflict and substantive provisions, of the respective external competence of the EC and member States, and on the relationship of EC conflict of law rules with Ec principles and rules on free movement.Within this general framework, this research group aims at analysing the interaction between private international law and EC free movement provisions in matters of personal status (for both legal and natural persons) and successions.
Actually, in recent years some decisions of the EC Court of justice on free movement have shown that the relationhip between such rules and principles are developing and that the final solutions to be adopted are not clear yet. Apparently, the EC and its Member States seem to grant different values and to defend different principles: on the one hand, the realisation of a common and integrated area of freedom and justice, where natural and legal persons may circulate without any legal restriction or obstacle and realize their expectations; on the other hand, States aim at exercising their legislative competence in order to reach a number of goals that may limit individual rights. While in some recent but still rare cases the EC legislature >>>
Timescale
24 monthsNational and international background
With the signing of the Amsterdam Treaty (2 October 1997) the European Community has acquired extensive competences in the field of the conflicts of laws and jurisdiction, which have been subject to numerous and thorough studies in Italian and European legal doctrine. In such context, the interplay between private international law and EC free movement law in matters of legal and natural persons’ status has acquired major relevance.As regards the status of legal persons, namely of companies, the combined incidence of European case-law and legislation has outlined the tight relationship between private international and Community law. Until recently, the cross-border mobility of companies has been still rather difficult, since the 1968 Brussels Convention on the recognition of companies and legal persons has never entered into force, a uniform set of rules at Community level is still lacking, notwithstanding the adoption of a limited number of harmonised provisions, and domestic substantive and choice-of-laws provisions remain considerably different. However, in recent times the issue free movement of companies came to the foreground, not only because of important decisions of the Court of justice (Centros, Überseering, Inspire Art and Sevic), but also thanks to the activity of the EC legislature, having adopted the regulations on the European Company (Societas europaea, Reg. CE No 2157/2001) and on the European Cooperative Company (Reg. CE No 1435/2003), as well as >>>



