Contenuto
Ti trovi in: HOME »Programmi, progetti e risultati »I progetti »PRIN - Programmi di ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale»Programma di ricercaINIZIO_TESTO_DA_INDICIZZARE
RESEARCH PROGRAM
italiano - inglese
Research Units
Similar research programs:
- 1 - Inequality and social cohesion
- 2 - Inequality, poverty and social exclusion: analysis and coherence of data sources, new measures and models
- 3 - Representations of foreigners and their influence on interethnic relationships: cognitive bases, social dynamics, cultural differences.
- 4 - Third Sector, Lifeworlds and Social Capital in Italy
- 5 - market and cultures of responsibility. New trends of consumption and production.
- 6 - Educational resources, discontinuities, and reorganization of human capital.
- 7 - The construction and re-construction of space-time in daily practices.
- 8 - Second-generation youths in Italy: values, group-identifications, consumptions, projects. A confrontation on the inclusion/exclusion paths of the "new second generation" among different theoretical perspectives.
- 9 - The social distance in some italian urban areas
- 10 - Elites and subordinate classes in the Late Antique South - stratifications and social dynamics, material conditions and productive orders, urban and rural areas in Apulia and Lucania (integrated researches of history, archaeology and applied sciences).
Scientific and education field classification
- Field: Scienze politiche e sociali
Geographical classification
- Region: Lombardia
Bibliografia
Ambrosini M. (2001), La fatica di integrarsi, Il Mulino, Bologna.Appadurai A. (2005), Le merci e la politica del valore, in Mora E., (2005) (a cura di), pp. 3-75, (ed. orig. 1986).
Atkinson T., Cantillon B., Marlier E., Nolan B. (2002), Indicators for Social Inclusion in the European Union, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Atkinson A. (2003), Multidimensional deprivation: contrasting social welfare and counting approaches, mimeo, Nuffield College, Oxford.
Bagnasco A. (1999), Tracce di comunità, Bologna, Il Mulino.
Baudrillard J. (1976), La società dei consumi. I suoi miti e le sue strutture, Il Mulino, Bologna
Bauman Z. (2004), Lavoro, consumismo e nuove povertà, Città Aperta, Troina.
Beck U. (2000), La società del rischio, Carocci, Roma (ed. or. 1986).
Bourdieu P. (1983), La distinzione. Critica sociale del gusto, Il Mulino, Bologna (ed. or. 1979).
Bourdieu P. (1992), Risposte, Bollati e Boringhieri, Torino.
Bovone L. (1986), Teorie della quotidianità: ricerca di senso o negazione di senso?, in “Studi di Sociologia”, XXIV, 1.
Bovone L. (2000), Comunicazione. Pratiche percorsi soggetti, FrancoAngeli, Milano
Caillé A. (1991), Critica della ragione utilitaria, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.
Castel R. (1995), Les métamorphoses de la question sociale, Fayard, Paris.
Cella G.P. (1997), Le tre forme dello scambio, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Cesareo V. (2000). Società multietniche e multiculturalismi, Vita e Pensiero, Milano.
Calvi G. (1977), Valori e stili di vita degli italiani. Indagine psicografica nazionale, Isedi, Milano
Calvi G. (1993), Signori si cambia. Rapporto Eurisko sull’evoluzione dei consumi e degli stili di vita, Bridge Editore, Milano.
Codeluppi V. (1992), I Consumatori. Storie, tendenze, modelli, F. Angeli, Milano.
Crompton R. (1996), Classi sociali e stratificazione, Il Mulino, Bologna (ed. or. 1987).
Cucco E., Pagani R., Pasquali M., (a cura di) (2005) , Primo Rapporto sulla comunicazione sociale in Italia, Rai-Eri, Roma.
De Certeau M. (2001), L’invenzione del quotidiano, Edizioni del Lavoro, Roma (ed. orig. 1990).
Di Nallo E. (a cura di, 1997), Il significato sociale dei consumi, Laterza, Bari.
Donati P. (2000), Il dono in famiglia e nelle altre sfere sociali, in Dono e perdono nelle relazioni famigliari, a cura di E. Scabini e G. Rossi, Vita e Pensiero, Milano.
Douglas M. e Isherwood B. (1984), Il mondo delle cose. Oggetti, valori, consumi, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Duesenberry J.S. (1969), Reddito, risparmio e teoria del comportamento del consumatore, Etas Kompass, Milano.
Etzioni A. (1995) (a cura di) New Communitarian Thinking, University Press of Virginia (trad. parziale Nuovi comunitari, Arianna, Bologna 1999).
Fabris G. P. – Mortara V. (1986), Le otto Italie. Dinamica e frammentazione della società italiana, Mondatori, Milano.
Fabris G. P. (2003), Il nuovo consumatore: verso il postmoderno, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
Fiske J. (1995), Understanding popular culture, Routledge, London.
Fitoussi J.P., Rosanvallon P. (1996), Le nouvel âge des inégalités, Seuil, Paris.
Gadotti G. (2001a), Pubblicità sociale. Lineamenti, esperienze e nuovi sviluppi, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
Gadotti G. (a cura di) (2001b), La comunicazione sociale. Soggetti, strumenti e linguaggi, Arcipelago Edizioni, Milano
Gadotti G. (2005), Gli attori e i temi della comunicazione sociale, in Cucco E., Pagani R., Pasquali M., (a cura di) .
Godbout J. (1991) (con Caillé A.), Lo spirito del dono, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.
Keynes J.M. 1978, Teoria generale dell'occupazione, dell'interesse e della moneta, Utet, Torino.
Kimlicka W.1999, La cittadinanza multiculturale, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Jedlowski P.1986, Il tempo dell’esperienza, F. Angeli, Milano.
Lanzetti C. 1990, (a cura di), Qualità e senso della vita in ambiente urbano ed extraurbano, F. Angeli, Milano.
Leonini, L. et alii (2005), Italiani e stranieri, Roma, Donzelli.
Lull J. (1990), Inside family viewing, Routledge, London
Manghi S. (1995), Altruismo in “Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia”, XXXVI, 3
Mauss M. (1965), Saggio sul dono in Teoria generale della magia e altri saggi, Einaudi, Torino.
Mingione (1999), Le sfide dell’esclusione sociale: metodi, luoghi, soggetti, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Mora E. (a cura di) (2005), Gli attrezzi per vivere. Forme della produzione culturale tra industria e vita quotidiana, Vita e Pensiero, Milano.
Mutti A. (1992), Il buon vicino, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Negri N. e Saraceno C. (1996), Le politiche contro la povertà in Italia, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Negri N. e Saraceno C. (2000), Povertà, disoccupazione ed esclusione sociale, in “Stato e Mercato”, n. 2, pp. 175-210.
Paci M. (1996), I mutamenti della stratificazione italiana, in “Storia dell’Italia Repubblicana”, vol. III, Einaudi, Torino, pp. 667-776.
Polanyi K. (1974), La grande trasformazione, Einaudi, Milano.
Ranci C. (2002), Le nuove diseguaglianze sociali, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Rector E. R., Johnson K.A., Youssef S.E. (1999), The extent of material hardship and poverty in the United States, in “Review of Social Economy”, vol. LVII, n. 3.
Rovati G. (1991), Uguali e diversi, Vita e Pensiero, Milano.
Rovati G. (a cura di, 2003) Tra esclusione e solidarietà. Problemi emergenti e politiche per la sussidiarietà, IIMS, Roma.
Saraceno C. (2003) (a cura di), Rapporto sulle Politiche contro la Povertà e l’Esclusione Sociale, Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali, Carocci Edizioni.
Sarpellon G. (1990), Povertà e disuguaglianza: distinguere senza separare, in “Politica Economica”, n.2, pp. 201-215.
Sassatelli R. (2004), Consumo, cultura e società, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Sen A.K. (1986) Scelta, benessere, equità, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Sen A.K. (1999), Development as freedom, Knopf, New York (trad. it. Lo sviluppo è libertà, Mondadori, Milano, 2000)
Sen A. K. (2000), La diseguaglianza, Il Mulino, Bologna.
Simmel G. (1989), Sociologia, Comunità, Milano ( ed. or. 1908).
Veblen T. (1949), La teoria della classe agiata, Einaudi, Torino (ed. or. 1899).
Keywords
CONSUMPTION, POVERTY, IDENTITY, MATERIAL CULTURE, RECOGNITION, INCLUSION/EXCLUSION, EXCHANGE, GIFT, RECIPROCITYNegotiating the necessities: choices of consumption and choices of saving
Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreAbstract
The research is aimed at investigating the patterns of choices employed in the definition of consumer diets and consuming practices by some weak segments of the population. The innovative element in the project is represented by the effort to go beyond the common economism-driven stereotype, which wants people living under marginal economic, social and cultural conditions as excluded from the most typical contemporary consumption process, that is the opportunity for selecting their everyday goods and practices among a wide range of offers, mainly, but not solely, on the market; they wouldn’t therefore participate in the general process of negotiating and developing their social identity, which constitutes one of the most spread means of social inclusion and belonging expression. By contrast, the research assumes that people from all socio-economic backgrounds are engaged in the material and symbolic reproduction of their lives through their acquisition strategies, and in the continuous negotiation of needs, gift, solidarity, personal interests. The research is therefore aimed at identifying how people, in order to fulfil needs and desires and despite strong material, social and cultural constraints, adopt strategies which consist of exchanges within the formal market, as well as within informal and community networks, alternatively based on a reciprocity, gift and interest logic. The places where poor and needy people meet the responses provided by the community, in its >>>Principal Investigator
Laura Bovone Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreResearch Objectives
GoalsThe research is aimed at the attainment of innovative findings in the investigation of choosing patterns and consuming practices by some weak segments of the population. A clear purpose is that of going beyond the common economism-driven stereotype, which wants people living under marginal economic, social and cultural conditions as solely driven by the logic of basic needs and as excluded from the most typical contemporary consumption process, that is the opportunity for selecting their everyday goods and practices among a wide range of offers, mainly, but not solely, on the market; they wouldn’t therefore participate in the general process of negotiating and developing their social identity, which constitutes one of the most common ways to express social inclusion and exclusion.
By contrast, the research assumes that people from all socio-economic backgrounds are engaged in the material and symbolic reproduction of their lives through their acquisition strategies, and in the continuous negotiation of needs, gift, solidarity, personal interests. The research is therefore aimed at identifying how people pursue social inclusion and acknowledgement and negotiate their social identity through their consuming practices and despite strong material, social and cultural constraints.
Going into detail, the research projected is articulated in the following goals:
1. Comparing the interpretative and explanatory framework provided by >>>
Timescale
24 monthsNational and international background
The research is aimed at identifying choosing patterns within the development of consumption diets and consuming practices by some weak segments of the population, starting from the places usually attended by needy people in order to pursue basic goods and services (public and private social services, hospitals etc.). The innovative element in the project is represented by the effort to go beyond the common economism-driven stereotype, which wants people living under marginal socio-economic conditions - insofar as they can count on a limited economic, as well as cultural, relational and also temporal budget – as driven by the logic of basic needs and as excluded from the most typical contemporary consumption process, that is the opportunity for selecting their everyday goods and practices among a wide range of offers, mainly, but not solely, on the market. They wouldn’t therefore participate in the general process of negotiating and developing their social identity, which constitutes great part of the mechanisms of social inclusion and exclusion.This reductive approach neglects the complexity of human behaviour and the multiple exchange forms which cannot be reduced solely to market relations, insofar as they include the complex dimensions of gift and reciprocity (Caillé 1991; Cella 1997). By contrast, our research projects is grounded on the hypothesis that people from all socio-economic backgrounds are engaged in the material and symbolic reproduction of their >>>



